 |


FACES
What
makes a tyrant tick? Ask a political psychologist
Looking to mechanics to explain what cells do and
how they develop
Straddling law and medicine, and looking for an answer
to the malpractice crisis

ALUMNI

Reunion 2004 
Reunion reports
NOTES

Alumni
notes


Dean Robert Alpern, right, pictured with Frank Coughlin, past president
of the Association of Yale Alumni in Medicine.

Dean Robert Alpern visited with members of the Class of 1949 at the opening
reception in the Anlyan Center.

Arthur Crovatto (top photo with his wife, Janet) and Joseph Curi (bottom
photo), each received the Distinguished Alumni Service Award at this year's
reunion.

Donald Moore, president of the AYAM, welcomed alumni to the reunion at
the reception at the Anylan Center.


In his keynote speech at the reunion of public health alumni, Kelly Brownell,
director of the Yale Center for Eating and Weight Disorders, described
the rise in obesity rates and its causes in the United States.

Loretta DiPietro and Marlene Schwartz were on the panel that discussed
obesity and its implications.

Alumni spent time catching up between talks at the New Haven Lawn Club.




From top: Tia Powell, Philip Reilly and Rupali Gandhi were among panelists
at the medical school reunion who discussed ethical issues facing physicians.
Powell described doctor-patient relations in Japan; Reilly pondered the
question of genetic disorders and the physicians obligation to inform
family members who might be at risk; and Gandhi described the regulations
that protect children who are research subjects.




At a panel sponsored by the Yale Surgical Society, authors and surgeons
(top to bottom) Sherwin Nuland, Bernie Siegel and Richard Selzer described
how they moved from operating to writing.
|
 |
Reunion
2004
With a new dean, a new venue and new programs, alumni catch up at reunion.
Photographs by John Curtis and Terry Dagradi

Even as all the traditional trappings of reunion—the Friday evening
clambake, the Saturday morning symposium and the dean’s welcoming
reception—remained in place, change was in the air this year. At
the traditional Friday afternoon welcome in the Starr Atrium of the Anlyan
Center, the medical school’s new dean made his first appearance
before alumni.

“This is my fourth day as dean here,” said Robert J. Alpern,
M.D., who arrived from his post as dean of the University of Texas Southwestern
Medical Center on June 1. Alpern lauded the alumni for their support of
the school and said that he views serving as dean as “an incredible
opportunity.”

For those willing to come to New Haven a day early, a reinvigorated Yale
Surgical Society offered a Thursday afternoon roundtable, “The Surgeon
as Writer,” by three of its veterans. And this year’s reunion
included not one, but two scientific symposia, starting with a Friday
afternoon panel on cardiovascular disease. The traditional Saturday morning
panel discussed ethical issues facing physicians.

At the annual Saturday morning meeting of the Association of Yale Alumni
in Medicine (AYAM), two appointments were made to the executive committee.
Richard D. Kayne, M.D. ’76, HS ’79, was appointed to his first
two-year term. Irving G. Raphael, M.D. ’71, was elected to a second
two-year term. In addition, Ercem S. Atillasoy, M.D. ’91, and Frank
L. Gruskay, M.D. ’54, HS ’56, were named representatives to
the Association of Yale Alumni.

Arthur C. Crovatto, M.D. ’54, HS ’61, and Joseph F.J. Curi,
M.D. ’64, each received the Distinguished Alumni Service Award.
Of Crovatto, a classmate wrote, “It is reported that when you cut
yourself shaving, you bleed Yale blue. We thank you for your energy and
your dedication to the Yale School of Medicine.” To Curi, said Donald
E. Moore, M.D. ’81, M.P.H. ’81, president of the AYAM, “You
have been a tireless worker and loyal alumnus.”

Over lunch, talk about obesity
On Friday, at the New Haven Lawn Club, the topic at the School of Public
Health’s Alumni Day was obesity. During a panel discussion, a keynote
speech by Kelly D. Brownell, Ph.D., professor and chair of psychology
and director of the Yale Center for Eating and Weight Disorders, and a
luncheon talk by J. Michael McGinnis, M.D., Yale faculty and alumni discussed
the implications of the national epidemic of obesity and its related health
problems.

Elaine P. Anderson, M.P.H. ’76, director of alumni and community
affairs, joked that organizing a conference on obesity presented a new
problem. “This year,” she said, “the challenge was lunch.
We had some food fights and we had some disagreements. The entrees will
meet the requirements of Atkins, the South Beach diet and Carboholics
Anonymous.”

“I was planning to stay for lunch until I heard what it was going
to be,” Brownell quipped. “If it meets all those criteria
it’s going to be awful.”

In a more serious vein, Brownell said that the nation’s obesity
crisis has many roots. “Interwoven are complex social issues, political
beliefs, large-scale economic forces and, of course, science,” he
said. “What we are finding with the approach our government is taking,
as well as the food industry’s, is that science is becoming almost
irrelevant. That approach is driven by money and it leads to a focus on
personal responsibility instead of the global environmental causes that
are creating this problem in the first place.”

Following Brownell’s keynote talk, a panel discussed various aspects
of the obesity crisis. Participants included Loretta DiPietro, M.P.H.
’85, Ph.D. ’88, associate professor of epidemiology (environmental
health); Susan T. Mayne, Ph.D., associate professor of epidemiology and
public health; Marlene B. Schwartz, Ph.D. ’96, co-director of the
Yale Center for Eating and Weight Disorders; and Derek Yach, M.P.H., representative
of the director-general of the World Health Organization.

Luncheon speaker McGinnis of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF)
said that the current focus on counting carbs may help mitigate obesity,
but it diverts attention from the key issues. “There’s no
point arguing whether it’s fat or carbs that matter,” he said.
“It’s both.”

McGinnis laid part of the blame for America’s sugar- and starch-laden
diet at his own doorstep. In addition to being the principal architect
of the Healthy People process that elevated nutrition on the national
agenda, he was a key contributor to the Dietary Guidelines for Americans.
The Guide-lines lay out central nutritional concepts that still pertain,
but when the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) developed
the accompanying food pyramid many people looking at recommendations for
six to 11 daily servings of bread, cereal, rice and pasta failed to distinguish
between simple and complex carbohydrates.

“We in public health were so happy to have buy-in from the USDA,
with its sizable food-industry constituency, that the potential for misunderstanding
when it came to carbohydrates didn’t receive the emphasis it deserved.
We meant clearly to focus on high-fiber carbs, and the fact is I didn’t
pay enough attention to how the graphic might be misrepresented or to
the appropriateness of the number of servings,” McGinnis said. But
he added: “The good news is we have the opportunity now to get it
right.”

Getting it right is important, given that Americans consume 150 pounds
of sugar a year (compared to 7.5 pounds 200 years ago), McGinnis said,
adding that diet and activity patterns are now responsible for more than
500,000 premature deaths each year in the United States, ranking at the
top of the list of preventable causes of death. Because of the stakes
involved, the RWJF has made childhood obesity its top priority. “The
vision,” he said, “is not for everyone to be slim. Instead,
we want society’s signals to promote a healthy diet and healthy
living.”

At lunch the Distinguished Alumni Service Award was presented to James
M. Malloy, M.P.H. ’67, president of Malloy Associates, a health
care management consulting firm in Mississippi. James Rawlings, M.P.H.
’80, and Patti Harvey Rose, M.P.H. ’85, Ed.D., were inducted
into the Alumni Public Service Honor Roll.

Finding the genes that cause disease
From the two photographs, it seemed obvious who would live longer. One
showed a jogger, looking fit at 5’10” and 150 pounds. The
other showed a seated man with a double chin, 5’8” and 270
pounds—a cigar smoker.

Ironically, the jogger fared far worse than did his counterpart, reported
Richard P. Lifton, M.D., Ph.D., chair and Sterling Professor of Genetics,
speaking at the symposium titled “Cardiovascular Disease: From Bedside
to Bench and Back Again.” The first man, running guru James F. Fixx,
died of a heart attack at 52. The other, Winston Churchill, lived to be
90. The probable cause for the difference—genes—is increasingly
the subject of research at Yale into the leading cause of death in the
United States, said Lifton.

Lifton’s research has led him to “scour the globe” for
families with extreme phenotypes, such as severe hypertension, which develops
as early as adolescence. Lifton and his team identify the genetic mutations
affecting the families and show, on the molecular level, how the mutations
cause disease. Understanding these mechanisms could suggest ways to manipulate
gene products and pathways to fight diseases in the general population.

Other speakers included Jeffrey R. Bender, M.D., HS ’83, the Robert
I. Levy Professor of Preventive Cardiology, who discussed the effects
of hormone replacement therapy on vascular inflammation; William C. Sessa,
Ph.D., professor of pharmacology, who described his research on improving
peripheral circulation; and Stuart D. Katz, M.D., associate professor
of medicine, who discussed his hypothesis that lower serum iron levels
reduce the risk of endothelial disease.

The ethics of modern medicine
At the Saturday morning symposium four panelists described ethical issues
facing physicians and society. Thomas P. Duffy, M.D., explored “how
it is that we live our daily lives as physicians.” Rupali Gandhi,
J.D. ’00, M.D. ’04, discussed rules that protect children
in clinical trials. Patricia T. Powell, M.D. ’87, described the
Japanese practice of physicians informing families, rather than individuals,
of bad news. Philip R. Reilly, M.D. ’81, J.D., discussed the impact
of the genomic revolution.

For Duffy, the image of the physician has taken a beating. The New
York Times, he said, was having a field day with articles about alcoholic
practitioners, Botox queens of Park Avenue and “boutique”
doctors catering to the elite. On top of depictions of physicians as something
less than selfless healers, the demands of practice compete with those
of family, and physicians find themselves involuntary partners with insurance
companies that want a say in medical decisions. “Our profession
is a house divided, almost a house conquered. It is time to come together
to reflect on our moral dilemmas,” Duffy said.

Gandhi reviewed the issues concerning children as research subjects. In
1789, she noted, Edward Jenner made the questionable decision to test
the worth of cowpox as a smallpox vaccination by inoculating his son.
“Children,” Gandhi said, “lack the maturity and the
information base to make a truly informed decision. The regulations [governing
clinical trials] provide children with additional protections because
they are a vulnerable group. Nevertheless, although regulations limit
the participation of children in research trials, problems—such
as ambiguous and inconsistent terminology—persist.”

During the four years she lived in Japan, Powell was at first appalled
by physicians’ reluctance to share bad news with a patient. “I
could not imagine any principled reason for not revealing to patients
their diagnoses,” she said. Yet in Japan physicians are more likely
to relay the information to a family member and, with the patient’s
family, invent a fiction about the illness and find a way to continue
treatment. However, a shift is under way and disclosure has become acceptable
if the patient is psychologically stable and capable of making a decision
regarding treatment; there are good relations between the doctor, patient
and family; and the patient has a strong support network.

Family relations are also of concern to Reilly, CEO and chair of the board
of Interleukin Genetics. If a patient has a genetic disorder, does the
physician have an obligation to inform family members who might also be
vulnerable? And how can a physician inform others without violating patient
confidentiality? Pharmacogenetics, he added, “will change everything
about patient care.”

Reilly also worries about genetic testing of fetuses. A survey of pregnant
American women conducted in the mid-1990s found that many considered gene
variants that predispose to obesity as serious as genetic mutations that
cause cystic fibrosis. “I worry about a culture that is more interested
in perfection,” Reilly said.

The surgeon as writer
Richard A. Selzer, M.D., HS ’61, gave up surgery, but he cannot
give up writing. “Once you have become an artist and that third
eye of the artist is open, it can never be closed,” he said.

At the ninth annual spring reunion of the Yale Surgical Society, Selzer
and fellow writers and surgeons Sherwin B. Nuland, M.D. ’55, HS
’61, and Bernie S. Siegel, M.D., HS ’61, discussed the paths
that led them away from surgery, even while drawing heavily on their experiences
as physicians.

For Siegel, the act of writing was self-preservation as he struggled emotionally
with death and dying. “The training we don’t have is: How
do you deal with loss?” he explained. He coped by keeping a journal.
Impressions grew in complexity and Siegel found himself writing books.
He divided his calendar between medicine and writing until he noticed
that he had colored all his days in surgery black—he had come to
prefer writing.

Nuland’s entry into literature was less deliberate. A literary agent
asked him to write a book called How We Die. Nuland declined until
it dawned on him that the book would be an opportunity “to write
about my entire career, indeed my entire life.”

How We Die was not what the agent envisioned. It was also a surprise
to the author, who uncovered, “an entire philosophy about death
and dying that I didn’t know I had.”

Like Selzer, who teaches creative writing to Yale medical and nursing
students, Nuland believes medicine provides rich material for literature.
“Please do write,” Nuland told his colleagues in the audience,
before adding, to laughter, “but whatever you write, don’t
send it to me.”
|
 |



|