|
Research Guidelines
Thesis
Requirement Guide for Students and Faculty Sponsors (PDF , Word)
Choosing a Research Mentor & Thesis
Project
Developing a Research Hypothesis
Medical Research in the Humanities and the Arts
Literature Review & Protocol Formulation
Statistical Analysis of Research Data
Research Project Restrictions
Students in Combined Programs
Choosing a Research Mentor & Thesis Project
A list of faculty
members and their areas of research is available online
at the Community of Science (COS) website.
You may browse the Faculty Research Directory or search
by keywords or by individuals listed in each department.
This website may be accessed only from a Yale computer
or via a remote access proxy
connection.
Dr. Forrest, Director of the Office of Student
Research, is available to discuss options with
individual students by appointment. After deciding
upon the area of general interest, the student
should check with members of the faculty in both
the basic and clinical sciences who are working
in that field. After appropriate discussions
with several potential mentors, the student should
choose the faculty member with whom he/she wishes
to work. Although it is not necessary that the
idea for the thesis originate with the student,
it is necessary that the work be his/her own.
The student can work as a member of a group project
only if the student’s contribution is carried
out on an independent basis. Dissertations written
jointly by two or more students are not acceptable.
Most Yale M.D. theses average 40-80 pages of
text. A minimum of 30 pages of text excluding
figures, legends and references is required.
In planning a project it should be clear that
the prime goal is to learn the scientific method
and not necessarily publish a paper. The faculty
member should make every effort to orient the
student to a practical problem that can be fulfilled
within the available time.
| Student Research Links |
| Community of Science (COS). Yale Faculty Research
Directory. |
| BBS. Combined Program
in the Biological and Biomedical
Sciences. |
| Academic Departments: |
|
|
|
Faculty Mentor Responsibilities
In order to insure a
better understanding of the expectation of the faculty
mentor's role, the following suggestions have been made.
- We recommend
that the actual
time devoted to data collection (laboratory
or other) be accomplished in a twelve-to-sixteen
period, minimally. Additional time is needed
for planning and literature review, for evaluation
of data and final write-up. Currently 50% of
Yale students elect to spend a fifth year of
medical school devoted fully or partially to
thesis research.
- The student
should not be assigned as a research technician
to accomplish
someone's project in the lab, including fellows.
- The faculty
mentor
should invest sufficient time in the student,
including weekly meetings
to discuss results
and where necessary, help to focus (or refocus)
the direction of the project.
- The student should develop with
the
faculty mentor his or her own project (although
others may participate) and should eventually
be encouraged by the faculty mentor to be
first author on abstracts and publications.
- The faculty mentor is responsible
for all research expenses (i.e. space,
resources, and facilities) and the supervision
of the experimental work.
- The faculty mentor is the first
reviewer and gives the initial approval of
the thesis as submitted for graduation. (For
more information see "Thesis
Approval
Process")
- The faculty mentor
should
plan to attend Student Research
Day activities
held in May of each year.
| Secondary Faculty
Advisors |
The
Yale faculty members listed below all have
expertise in the methodology of clinical
studies, clinical epidemiology and
biostatistics. These faculty members have agreed
to work with a maximum of two students per year
as a secondary thesis advisor. A secondary
faculty advisor should become involved on the
student's thesis at an early date (preferably in
the first few weeks of the project and before
any data is collected). The advisors have agreed
to meet with students for four sessions at the
beginning of the thesis project and an
additional four sessions after the data has been
gathered. The initial meeting should be attended
by both the medical student, the primary thesis
advisor and the secondary faculty advisor. The
focus will be on developing excellent
methodology. Please see the Directory of Faculty
Research Interests for more detailed information
on the faculty advisors specific areas of
interest.
NAME, DEPARTMENT
(telephone)
John Concato, Internal
Medicine (7-1674)
John Hughes, VA-Internal Med
(937-4918)
David Katz, EPH
(732-7328)
Walter Kernan, Internal Med
(8-2984)
Tom Kosten, VA-Psychiatry
(937-7438)
John Leventhal, Pediatrics
(8-2468)
Patrick G. O'Connor, Internal
Med (8-6532)
Eugene Shapiro, Pediatrics
(8-4518)
Richard Schottenfeld,
Psychiatry (974-7349)
Mary Tinetti, Geriatrics
(8-5238) |
|
 |
Developing a Research Hypothesis
Excellent research begins with a clear hypothesis which can be examined by the generation of new data by state-of-the-arts techniques. The hypothesis should be original and one which will generate substantial interest if answered by leading investigators in the field. It is not excellent research to investigate an hypothesis which is highly predictable or expected or in which there would be little interest. A review of the literature or review of patients' charts may be the source of data used for a thesis. However, the basic requirement still applies. There must be a hypothesis which can be supported or rejected on the basis of data gleaned from the patients' records or published literature. These data should be subjected to statistical analysis, and the results should either confirm or reject the original hypothesis. As with any other thesis, a review of the literature and a section dealing with the interpretation of the data and a discussion of its importance should be included. A literature review cannot be a simple narrative describing the information obtained from these sources.
| *Developing a Clinical
Research Project |
Opportunities are available for
you to pursue a thesis project in
either basic or clinical research.
Clinical research is less completely “controllable,” and
is therefore more subject to potential
confounders and sources of bias.
However, clinical research offers
the advantage of more direct clinical
relevance. Whatever topic you choose,
you can likely find a qualified advisor
in the medical school. But an advisor
knowledgeable in your area of interest
may or may not have a strong background
in research methods. If they do not,
you should be prepared to follow
a systematic process in the development
of your project to be sure the results
are what you intend.
Click here to for the Developing
a Clinical Research Protocol: The
Survival Guide |
|
Literature Review and Protocol Formulation
When the area of investigation has been approved
by the faculty preceptor and Departmental Thesis
Chairperson, the student is expected to explore
the literature and formulate a protocol. This
step provides an unusual opportunity for tutorial
instruction in experimental design. Faculty members
who assume responsibility as preceptors should
provide the amount of guidance that is necessary
in design of the investigation.
Medical Research in the Humanities and the Arts
| Medical Research in the Humanities and the Arts |
Each year some students elect to conduct medical research for their M.D. thesis in one or another area of the humanities, social sciences, and the arts (including medical history, medical ethics, medicine and the law, film, photography, medical sociology, medical anthropology, and literature). Like other kinds of student research, the creative discipline required in pursuing the M.D. thesis in these areas helps shape the physician-scholar by cultivating critical judgment, imagination, and scholarship, while developing critical research skills and making an original contribution. At the same time, the challenges involved in research pursued in the archive, library, or field may differ from those encountered in the laboratory.
Click here to for the Medical Research in the Humanities and the Arts: The Survival Guide |
|
Statistical Analysis of Research Data
When the results of an investigation lend themselves to statistical analysis, the student should be encouraged to seek the aid of a biometrist for assistance in statistical methodology. It is hoped that this will enable the student to learn the value and limitations of statistical analysis as an aid to interpreting the results of an investigation. See the list of Secondary Thesis Advisors for clinical epidemiology methods.
| Computer Facilities for
Statistical Analysis |
Yale's Prevention Research Center
(PRC), located off-campus in Derby,
is a resource to students needing
assistance with data management and/or
statistical analysis, survey development
and validation, as well as refinement
of clinical study methodology. The
PRC data management staff will work
with students to perform statistical
analysis using a variety of software
packages. Referrals can be provided
as needed to additional resources
available through the computer labs
at the Yale Schools of Public Health,
and Management.
Contact the PRC at
203-732-1265,
or Dr. Valentine Njike, data manager,
at valentine.njike@yalegriffinprc.org. |
|
Project Restrictions
Joint Projects Are Not Acceptable
Dissertations written jointly by two or more students are not acceptable. This does not mean that they may not work on related problems, but each student should have the experience of carrying out an investigation from beginning to end on his/her own initiative.
Research Involving Human Subjects
All research involving human subjects must be approved by the Human Investigation Committee (HIC) of the School of Medicine. Applications and guidelines are available online (http://info.med.yale.edu/hic/forms/index.html) or in the Office of the Chairman of the Committee, 47 College Street, Suite 208.
Research Done Outside of the Yale Medical School
A student may wish to undertake his/her research
project under the supervision of a qualified
investigator who is not a member of the faculty
of Yale University School of Medicine. The
approval of an outside preceptor will be granted
by the Office of Student Research upon receipt
of a statement by a full time Yale faculty member
acting as sponsor and mentor, in whose area the
research work will be done. The statement
should indicate the Yale mentor has approved
the preceptor and the facilities available for
the research project. The same regulations concerning
the dates of submission and review by the appropriate
departmental committee will apply to the thesis
done outside of the medical school. Specifically,
the faculty member will be responsible for reviewing
the progress of the thesis with the student,
reviewing the written thesis and giving faculty
approval. The thesis will be reviewed by the
Department Thesis Committee of this faculty member’s
department.
 |
Students in Combined Programs
Ph.D. Thesis in Lieu of M.D. Thesis
For students
enrolled in the combined M.D./Ph.D. Program, the doctoral
thesis submitted to and approved by the Graduate School
will serve in lieu of the thesis requirement of the
Medical School. The Graduate School awards degrees twice
a year, in late fall (November or December, depending on
the Corporation schedule) and May. In order to guarantee
consideration by the appropriate Graduate School
Committee on Degrees, the dissertation must be submitted
by September 15 for a fall degree, or March 15 for a May
degree. Students planning to submit the dissertation on
March 15 for a May degree, however, should make every
effort to file the petition by March 1, so that planning
for commencement ceremonies can proceed in a timely
fashion. If the Ph.D. has not been completed, a separate
M.D. thesis must be submitted to qualify for the M.D.
degree.
M.D./M.P.H. Program
For students in the M.D./Ph.D. Program, one thesis
satisfies both degree requirements provided it is
approved and carried out under a Yale faculty member of
the Department of Epidemiology and Public Health and is
in an appropriate subject area. The same regulations
concerning the dates of the M.D. thesis submission and
review by the appropriate departmental committee will
apply.

|