|
LAB
NEWS
October
1995 . . . . . . . . . . Vol. 38 No. 1
Chairman:
Peter Jatlow,
M.D.
Editors: Edward L. Snyder, M.D.; Petrie M. Rainey, M.D.,
Ph.D.
Production Assistant: Terri M. Fiondella
Contributors: Frank Bia, M.D.; Stephen Edberg, Ph.D.; Steve
Mechanic, M.D.; Brian Smith, M.D.; Petrie Rainey, M.D., Ph.D.; Mark
Velleca, M.D., Ph.D.
CRYPTOSPORIDIUM
PARVUM, DRINKING WATER AND PATIENT TESTING
The
Biology of Cryptosporidiosis
We really do not know how many species of Cryptosporidia exist,
but this infection is found in more than 40 different mammals, and
is particularly noteworthy for causing infections among farm animals.
The human pathogen, referred to as Cryptosporidium parvum, may
have been observed as early as 1895. The murine form of crypto-sporidiosis
was clearly noted on the gastric mucosa of mice around 1907, and Tyzzer
had elucidated the parasites life cycle by 1910.
C. parvum is transmitted by the fecal-oral route, beginning
with human ingestion of the infective oocysts. As the parasite goes
through its life cycle within the infected host, more infective
oocysts are passed into the environment. However, oocysts appear
to be produced in two varieties. Thin-walled cysts probably break
open within the gastrointestinal tract of the host, releasing free
sporozoites which can, in turn, infect other enterocytes within
the same host. This is an autoinfective process that would permit
amplification of infection, with serious implications for immunocompromised
patients. Amplification and dissemination of strongyloidiasis is
also known to occur under such conditions. The autoinfective process
guarantees that chronic persistent disease continues even in the
absence of repeated exposure to more infective oocysts.
Thick-walled cysts are passed into the environment. They are infective
and relatively resistant to both chlorine and ozone. Unfortunately
infection is common among farm animals. When run off from farm lands
is able to contaminate groundwater, environmental contamination
is not easily controlled.
Water
Sources
Dupont et al. (1) recently reported that the calculated ID50(50%
infectious dose) for a clone of Cryptosporidium parvum in
human volunteers was 132 oocysts. A total of 29 normal volunteers
participated in this feeding study. Five of six who received 500
oocysts became ill; 2/3 who received 300; 3/8 who received 100;
and 1/5 who received 30.
There was no detectable secondary spread among household contacts.
When present in finished water, Cryptosporidium parvum is
generally found at very low concentrations (<1/L). The MMWR (2)
reported the analysis of a Cryptosporidium workshop held at the
CDC in Atlanta in September 1994. This report (2) summarizes the
views of attendees concerning epidemiology, future research, the
role for laboratory testing of drinking water, and drinking water
recommendations for the highly immunocompromised patient. It was
difficult to estimate the percent of Cryptosporidiosis contributed
from drinking water compared to other routes of transmission, such
as human to human (e.g., sexual activity, fecal-oral) and food to
human.
Cryptosporidiosis is not a reportable disease in many states and
even where present, it is under-reported. Moreover, physicians may
not always order the appropriate diagnostic test and such testing
may not be included in routine "O&P" examinations.
Virtually all surface water contains Cryptosporidium and current
treatment processes cannot guarantee its removal. The MMWR report
states that im-munocompromised individuals may want to consume water
that is either boiled, obtained from a subterranean protected source,
or instead use processed bottled water.
Cryptosporidium oocysts are present in 65 to 97% of surface drinking
water sources. In finished tap water oocytes have been found in
27 to 54% of communities surveyed. A number of outbreaks have occurred
in the United States and other countries. In the U.S. all outbreaks
have occurred in tap water that has met all federal regulations.
Furthermore, all the water sources associated with these outbreaks
have been filtered. However, both the U.S. and most other countries
only require infrequent testing of tap water, on the order of 1
coliform test per month per 1000 population. Therefore, it is not
surprising that coliform tests may not be positive in an outbreak
situation because the tests are performed so infrequently they would
likely miss a spike of oocysts passing through the water distribution
system (3).
Water
Testing and Treatments
Results of Cryptosporidium testing of drinking water cannot be used
to make public health decisions because the procedure has extremely
poor sensitivity and specificity (4, 5). The procedure for analysis
of Cryptosporidium in drinking water is very complex. It yields
many false positives, and it has a sensitivity of less than 20%.
Also, the procedure cannot distinguish infectious from noninfectious,
or viable from non-viable, oocysts. If performed, virtually all
water utilities could find oocysts in their source surface water
and one-quarter to one-half would find them in their finished water.
Cryptosporidium is not found in subterranean (i.e., deep aquifer)
water which is not subject to surface water influence. In the U.S.
approximately 50% of public tap drinking water comes from surface
water; however, human exposure to surface water is increased since
surface and subterranean sources are often mixed. Filtration and
coagulation used in the municipal water industry may not remove
oocysts, which are also resistant to chlorination.
Those at serious risk for Cryptosporidiosis (i.e., AIDS patients,
and others who are profoundly immunocompromised) should take drinking
water precautions. First, they should not consume tap water that
has surface water as its source, even in part. Secondly, they can
boil their tap water for one minute. Thirdly, they can consume bottled
water which has absolute source protection (meets European directive
80/777), or is subject to other barrier protection. These include
frequent testing for coliforms in the source and finished product
and one or more of the following: distillation, reverse osmosis,
and 1 micron absolute filtration. Ozonation is effective against
Cryptosporidia but the exact conditions and standards are still
being established. Bottlers that are members of the International
Bottled Water Association have manufacturing and plant inspection
rules that provide for a substantial level of safety. Information
regarding a particular bottled water can be obtained using the 800
telephone number printed on each bottle or from the bottler's address.
Point-of-use devices which are 1 micron absolute as certified by
the NSF should provide effective protection, but these must be maintained
frequently, since they may concentrate and provide a growth medium
for bacteria.
Clinical
Disease
For an infected patient the level of immuno-competence will determine
whether an acute and self-limited infection moves further on to
cause low-grade fever, watery diarrhea and abdominal discomfort
on an acute or chronic basis. For immunocompromised individuals
Cryptosporidiosis may cause respiratory disease, cholecystitis,
cholangitis, and pancreatitis. It is not known whether the debilitating
diarrhea of Cryptosporidiosis is caused by a toxin or some other
mechanism of damage to the infected enterocyte's microvillus border.
Whatever the mechanism is for diarrhea production, it is markedly
enhanced by immunosuppression particularly that associated with
AIDS (6).
Diagnosis
of Cryptosporidiosis
If an intestinal biopsy has already been performed as part of a
patient's clinical work-up C. parvum can be observed by light
microscopy using routine hematoxylin and eosin staining or electron
microscopy. For stool samples our parasitology laboratory employs
a modification of the acid-fast stain which utilizes dimethyl sulfoxide
to enhance carbol fuchsin stain penetration and identify C. parvum
oocysts (DMSO Modified Acid Fast Stain Kit, Trend Scientific,
St. Paul MN). Size is important for identification of acid-fast
oocysts to distinguish Cryptosporidia from the somewhat larger Cyclospora
species.
FIGURE 1
Any stool sent for Cryptosporidium exam will receive a DMSO stain
and an ELISA test for Cryptosporidium antigen. The stains will be
done as usual and the antigens will be batched twice a week. If
the DMSO stain is negative and the ELISA for Cryptosporidium is
positive the following comment will be used: Although Cryptosporidia
were not observed on direct staining, this sample tested positive
using the more sensitive ELISA technique. Consider Cryptospiridia
results positive for this sample. (Also any stool requested
for ova and parasite exam for any patient on the Atkins Service
or from the Nathan Smith Clinic will automatically receive a DMSO
acid-fast stain and an ELISA test.)
Figure 1 shows our diagnostic work-up for stool specimens obtained
from patients in whom cryptosporidiosis is suspect. We recently
decided to supplement acid-fasting staining with a commercially
available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ProSpect Cryptosporidium)
Microtiter Assay; Alexon Inc., Sunnyvale, CA). This allows us to
confirm positive specimens and detect additional positive samples
not observed with the modified acid-fast stain. Test specificity
is based upon detection of a Cryptosporidium-Specific Antigen (CSA)
which is produced by these parasites during their replication in
the GI tract. The anti-CSA antibody is bound to wells in the plastic
microtiter plates. This antibody captures any antigen present in
stool samples. When the test is positive, a second anti-CSA antibody
which is labeled with horseradish peroxidase attaches to the antigen
in a sandwich allowing for spectrophotometric detection. The sensitivity
of the assay appears to be greater than 95% and specificity is even
greater. Cross-reactivity with other parasites is not a problem.
Since parasitic infections are often found as multiple infections
this is an important feature of such tests.
References
- Dupont
HL, Chappell CL, Sterling CR. The infectivity of cryptosporidium
parvum in healthy volunteers. New Engl J Med 1995;332:855.
- CDC.
Assessing the health threat associated with waterborne cryptosporidiosis:
Report of a workshop. MMWR 44: No. RR-6. 1-8.
- Hardalo
CJ. Safe water for travelers. Travel Medicine Advisor Update 1995;5:4.
- Edberg
SC. Association of indicators with Crypto-sporidium. J American
Water Works Assoc. 1994; 4:98.
- Clancy
JL, et al. Reproductibility of Cryptosporidium assays. J. American
Water Works Assoc. 1994; 86:89-97.
- Topazian
M. Bia FJ. New parasites on the block: emerging intestinal protozoa.
Gastroenterologist 1994; 2:147.
Frank J. Bia, M.D., M.P.H.; Stephen C. Edberg, Ph.D., ABMM
|